If this fits you please answer these questions. I'll be including these and probably others at the end of my article on Limited Atonement.
Questions for Reformed Calvinists
1. If Limited Atonement was taught in the Bible then can any Reformed person tell me why would Hebrews 2:9 state that Christ should taste death for everyman?
2. If Limited Atonement is a correct doctrine then can Reformed explain 2 Pet 2:1 which says “denying the Lord that bought them.” If Christ had only died for the church as Reformed claim that Acts 20:28 teaches then why would 2 Pet 2:1 state that Christ also died for the false teachers?
3. If God only wanted certain people to be saved and to come to a knowledge of the truth, then can any Calvinist tell me why 2 Pet 3:9 was included in the New Testament?