
Originally Posted by
BroRog
The phrase "according to the flesh" translates the Greek phrase "kata sarka" and appears at least 20 times, mostly in Paul's writings. In each case it seems to me that the Greek term "kata" is intended to convey the idea of "with regard to" and the term "sarka" is intended to convey the idea of our humanity, which includes our identity, our family line, our ethnicity, our economic status, our occupation, our religion, etc.
A typical example can be found in the first chapter of Romans.
Roma 1:1 Paul, a bond-servant of Christ Jesus, called [as] an apostle, set apart for the gospel of God, 2 which He promised beforehand through His prophets in the holy Scriptures, 3 concerning His Son, who was born of a descendant of David according to the flesh . . .
Paul says that Jesus was born a descendant of David "according to the flesh." In this instance the "flesh" conveys the idea of Jesus' family line, just as many human beings identify with their family tree and take their identity from the family tree, Paul has placed Jesus among the human family as a descendant of David.
To take a step back for a moment, we can ask two questions about a person's humanity: Who are you?, and What are you? The answer to "what are you? are things like: flesh and blood; body, soul and spirit; creature; homosapien, and etc. The answer to "Who are you?" are things like: name, address, family line, ancestry, ethnicity, culture, history, social group, country of origin, economic status, religion, military status, etc.
The phrase "according to the flesh" conveys the side of our humanity that answers the question, "Who are you?" And so, who is Jesus according to his human identity? He is a descendant of David. That's his ancestry.
Here is another example from Romans.
4:1 What then shall we say that Abraham, our forefather according to the flesh, has found?
From Paul's perspective, if someone were to ask Paul, "Who are you? One thing he would say is "Abraham is my ancestor; he is my forefather." According to human reckoning, Abraham is part of Paul's family line; Abraham was part of Paul's personal history; Abraham was a patriarch of Paul's family.
Now for the verse at hand.
Ephesians 6:5 Slaves, be obedient to those who are your masters according to the flesh, with fear and trembling, in the sincerity of your heart, as to Christ . . .
With regard to how human beings classify and identify themselves, some Christians were slaves. If someone were to ask, "who are you?", the slave would answer "I am the slave of so-and-so". His slave status is part of who he is, reckoned in terms of his humanity. In terms of his new identity in Christ, he is a slave of Jesus Christ. But in terms of his present identity in this world, he is a slave of a master "according to the flesh", or "with regard to how we answer the question, "who am I?" as a human being.
Bookmarks