Re: Wouldn't it be nice...

Originally Posted by
ProjectPeter
It is a debate forum guys and set up as such. Theology is what determines a lot of how folks interpret various passages of the Bible. Trying to get rid of that is like me changing my hair to a different color without the use of chemicals and dyes. Our theology and doctrine are part of what and who we are... that's a reality. Even those of you who think you are free from such as that... you aren't. That's why, no matter the passage posted to discuss, someone believes what they do and you believe something differently.
I will say this too and you guys take it in the spirit intended and don't go elsewhere. I read where folks get frustrated and aggravated when these discussions get froggy. Okay... why? Do you agree with each and every doctrine out there? No. Do you just keep silent because you don't want to contend for what you believe? Sounds like a lot of you are. That would be wrong for some of you guys who I know are strong enough to handle such a discussion. If you have no patience for this.. then look at that flaw in your own life because by now... you should have enough to contend with what goes on in here.
The wrestling comment... I hear you but honestly, that is not a proper nor fair representation of what goes on in here and a lot of moderator's bust their backsides to try and keep that sort of thing from happening. If you don't like debate then cool. Don't debate. Just because others do doesn't make them "fighting" in such a manner. Were it not for very passionate debate then rest assured that we would all be circumcised (men and boys) and we'd be following the Law of Moses to the letter. I for one am glad that the Apostle's and elders didn't shy away from it. You can see Acts 15 for further understanding.
Certainly all debate is not wrong and is good and necessary. Acts 15 is a good example. We see to where Paul and Barnabas had serious disagreement. Jesus himself sometimes went looking for a way to offend those around him, like when he saw what was in the religious heart about healing on the sabbath. Yet, there were times when Jesus avoided debate like when he asked "Is John from God or men?"
Yet, if we look to the heart of the verse in Titus, it is about avoiding certain kinds of strife. Then, IMO, he gives an interesting verse to go with it.
Titus 3:10-11
10 Reject a factious man after a first and second warning, 11 knowing that such a man is perverted and is sinning, being self-condemned.
NASU
There are people who just cause division. They will cause strife. They will cause debate. These people should be marked and separated from.
I suppose I could say more. Lord knows I have felt the convicting hand of the Holy Spirit when my debate got out of hand and been prompted by him to engage in debate after I had ignored it for a time. One thing that I have often wondered about is how the internet and places like BibleForums fits within the kingdom. Though that is another whole discussion, I am somewhat confused because I see a clear time and place for debate within a church. (In Acts 15, agreement was actually reached after debate.) I also see a place for it in evangelism as Paul did at Mars Hill.
But with Bibleforums, it's not a church. Thus some of the rules that I see in place to govern churches may not apply here. And there is no real governing body where we are all submitted to it in the "real world". Our submission to the authority begins when we enter the forum and ends when we leave it. Such things make it harder for me to have clear thoughts and where some lines should be drawn.
"May the Lamb that was slain receive the just reward for His sufferings." A quote by Moravian missionary that sold himself (along with a friend) into slavery to reach those that the slave owner prevented from hearing the gospel.
May I live for Him and not for me.
Bookmarks