
Originally Posted by
BroRog
Can't and won't are two different things. When Jesus says that he will not lose any that the Father has given him, his point centers on a promise the Father makes to the son.
But if "given" is the same as "believing", those who cease to believe cease to be given. One who comes to disbelief and therefore becomes unsaved has not been lost by the Son.
So, for instance, if the Father promises to give Joe from Pittsburgh to his the son, then Joe from Pittsburgh, won't fall away. Jesus will not lose any that the Father has given him.
No, think of it this way:
"Those You have given to Me --- they were believing in You, and you gave them through their belief to Me."
It does not prohibit the idea that if one ceases to believe, he ceases to be "given".
Whether or not the Father has given me or you to the Son is not immediately apparent. We find out whether or not the Father has given us to the Son through trials of faith. Only after our faith remains after trial, do we know that the Father has given us to the Son.
Ahhh, this parallels "Reformed Theology". Tell me --- can you know that you're saved and belong to Jesus forever? You can only answer "NO".
Only perseverance until death proves one is "truly-elected", rather than "cruelly-rejected" in Reformed Theology.
To illustrate --- what is the difference between the Thirteeners (Luke8:13), and the Fifteeners (Luke8:15)? Both began being "joyful believers"; but you would say the Fifteeners proved their sovereign election by perseverance, while the Thirteeners only THOUGHT they were wanted by God --- He didn't really want them, He let them be JOYFUL thinking they belonged to Him but He cruelly turned His back on them and never enrolled them in eternity (thus they fell because of their sovereign unelection).
Thus the need for the warnings.
Warnings are useless if all is decided by God; are you going to warn the elect that they're saved? Or the unelect that they're NOT? Warnings cannot change anything under "sovereign predestined-salvation".
So warnings are silly and useless.
The Apostles don't know and neither do we who among us is a person the Father has given to his son until we go through trial.
Ahhhh, so those who WANT to be loved by God (but He doesn't want them!) are cruelly allowed to THINK they're saved and belong to God; but "they prove their UNELECTION by falling away some time before death". And since both the Thirteeners and the Fifteeners at some point joyfully believe, no one can truly know he or she is "truly-elected", or just "cruelly-rejected".
"I write this to you who believe in the name of the Son of God that you may KNOW you have eternal life." 1Jn5:13
That we may know; not that "we can HOPE and SWEAT and WORRY that we'll prove are REAL election by perseverance until death".
The testing of our faith is more precious than gold, Peter says. Why? Passing the test gives us confidence that we are one of his.
Did the Thirteeners think they were one of His? Yes. But they were wrong, weren't they? They PROVED that God didn't really want them or love them by FALLING AWAY. And no one can know he's a Thirteener (deluded into thinking Jesus loved him and died for him), or a Fifteener (the truly elect who WILL persevere because of God's sovereign choice), until his very last breath --- can he?
"God is love." 1Jn4:16.
What is God to the majority of people whom He does not want, does not love, and did not sovereignly elect? He's not love to most (under Reformed Theology), is He?
"For God so loved
(some of) the world, that WHOSOEVER (all those He ordained and gave new hearts to) believes (but He wants them to disbelieve for much of their lives, for some reason) should not perish (well of course not, those He ordained not to perish won't!) but have eternal life (as He has decided; but most He's ordained to be sinful, to be hated, and to perish)."
John3:16 w/Reformed Understanding
How is that credible to anyone?
Bookmarks