Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

[brindle]

The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
For Immediate Release

March 16, 2012


Executive Order -- National Defense Resources Preparedness

EXECUTIVE ORDER
NATIONAL DEFENSE RESOURCES PREPAREDNESS

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the Defense Production Act of 1950, as amended (50 U.S.C. App. 2061 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces of the United States, it is hereby ordered as follows:

http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-...s-preparedness

[Angel Water]

Aka/ Constitutional Topic: Martial Law ?


Interesting time to be alive.

[Ceegen]

I just hope and pray that whatever happens, I have God's help. I don't need a legion of angels, God. Just one angel with your authority and power is enough for me, I believe. Strengthen us in our time of need and guide our path, just as you guided your people through the desert for forty years. Lead and I will follow! Don't let me fail you, God!

[Caleb]

Don't know much about these things, but it seems that this part is giving many cause for concern:

Sec. 201. Priorities and Allocations Authorities

(b) The Secretary of each agency delegated authority under subsection (a) of this section (resource departments) shall plan for and issue regulations to prioritize and allocate resources and establish standards and procedures by which the authority shall be used to promote the national defense, under both emergency and non-emergency conditions. Each Secretary shall authorize the heads of other agencies, as appropriate, to place priority ratings on contracts and orders for materials, services, and facilities needed in support of programs approved under section 202 of this order.

It seems that martial law can be introduced not only in times of emergency, but now also in times of non-emergency conditions.

[keck553]

To be fair and balanced, this already existing document was probably revived to include DHS, nothing more than that seems to be added to it. Most of the verbage goes back to the original presidential order which dates back to the mid-1950's.

I'd be more focused on the current administration's corruption in their zealous support of the cult of death.

[awestruckchild]

So...what are "non-emergency" conditions?
It just sounds to me like it is saying that they have the authority to allocate, etc., in times of peace as well as emergency, which makes sense to me because you want a plan and some resources in place BEFORE the emergency situation happens.
I'll admit, I am not a political animal. Am I missing something? Am I too dense?

[keck553]

So...what are "non-emergency" conditions?
It just sounds to me like it is saying that they have the authority to allocate, etc., in times of peace as well as emergency, which makes sense to me because you want a plan and some resources in place BEFORE the emergency situation happens.
I'll admit, I am not a political animal. Am I missing something? Am I too dense?

I think you (and many of us) are missing the fact that this order has been standing since the mid 1950's.

[awestruckchild]

Well....have they made some changes to it? Could that be why it's causing a dying duck fit?

[keck553]

Well....have they made some changes to it? Could that be why it's causing a dying duck fit?

Possibly. I haven't studied each word and phrase, but apparently it was resurrected to include DHS and that was the only change made. It wouldn't be diffiicult to check with about 8 hours of free time.

[Ceegen]

Possibly. I haven't studied each word and phrase, but apparently it was resurrected to include DHS and that was the only change made. It wouldn't be diffiicult to check with about 8 hours of free time.

Yeah, they included DHS because DHS can then enforce things, in times of "peace". It's an executive, hostile takeover.

[keck553]

Yeah, they included DHS because DHS can then enforce things, in times of "peace". It's an executive, hostile takeover.

So can a lot of agencies, apparently including the US military thanks to another piece of legislation. Besides, keeping DHS out of the loop would disable their "efficency" to function in a coordinated fashion.

It doesn't matter how many "agencies" there are - the US has 90 million armed ciitizens.

[Ceegen]

It doesn't matter how many "agencies" there are - the US has 90 million armed ciitizens.

Some loyal, some not. Some will give up, others will fight. But they'll have to disarm us first. In a Martial Law take-over, you'll see door-to-door confiscation of firearms as they did after hurricane Katrina rolled through New Orleans. When people resist, we'll have a civil war. I'd wager socialists can't wait for the day their benevolent dictator (whoever it may be) takes over if they get that far. Judging by how many people voted in Obama, we have a lot of socialists among us, and some of those 90 million firearms owners are socialists/communists. One of the guys at my last unit while I was in the Army had a tattoo of Che Guevara on his arm, he's a die-hard communist. They're everywhere!

[Dravenhawk]

I hate to say I told you so over a year ago but there is more to that martial law revisement than just writing in DHS. The pieces are being laid in place for the installation of a dictator or emporer of the USA. All we need now is a good solid crisis, shake well and presto the USA is transformed into the USSA (United Socialist States of America) Obama and the left have been whipping up racial tensions in this country for the last three years. If i were to have my guess I would speculate on someone from the ranks of Obamas progressive leftists to assasinate him in his second term. Either that or the new black panthers and Louis Farachan get the country so whipped up over that florida killing thus triggering black on white race riots that Obama inacts martial law and declares himself emporer - - - - Dravenhawk

[keck553]

Some loyal, some not. Some will give up, others will fightj. But they'll have to disarm us first. In a Martial Law take-over, you'll see door-to-door confiscation of firearms as they did after hurricane Katrina rolled through New Orleans. When people resist, we'll have a civil war. I'd wager socialists can't wait for the day their benevolent dictator (whoever it may be) takes over if they get that far. Judging by how many people voted in Obama, we have a lot of socialists among us, and some of those 90 million firearms owners are socialists/communists. One of the guys at my last unit while I was in the Army had a tattoo of Che Guevara on his arm, he's a die-hard communist. They're everywhere!

That's what happens when half the country is on the dole....