It is not so black and white
Read all about it!
Hold up. Let's establish a definitional framework to work with.
I just demonstrated that, by the very definition of the terms, 'literal' and 'figurative' are antonyms. Will you acknowledge this? It is quite obvious that Satan is not literally a Dragon. So, any reference to Satan as a dragon must be understood as a figure of speech.
Rejoice, you asked me if Luke 19:40 is literal, but your previous comments have demonstrated that you don't understand what the word 'literal' means. We need to be clear on the meaning of this word, if I am to answer your question.
So you understand and agree that Satan is not literally a dragon, and that figurative language is not to be taken literally?
You weren't eating random mushrooms you found on the ground during your hike through the woods, were you?Originally Posted by rejoice44
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)