Matt 2:19 But when Herod was dead, behold, an angel of the Lord appeareth in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, 20Saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and go into the land of Israel: for they are dead which sought the young child's life. 21And he arose, and took the young child and his mother, and came into the land of Israel. 22But when he heard that Archelaus did reign
in Judaea in the room of his father Herod, he was afraid to go thither: notwithstanding, being warned of God in a dream, he turned aside into the parts of Galilee
This is not saying that Archelaus would reign in Judea in the future, it's saying He "did reign" or was reigning at that time in Judea.
But whether it's speaking of currently reigning on the earth or reigning on the earth in the future doesn't make a difference to me. It's not a problem for my doctrine either way.
If you think this is saying that He doesn't receive His kingdom until He returns then you are mistaken. Look at what it says just a few verses earlier:
Luke 19:12 He said therefore, A certain nobleman went into a far country to receive for himself a kingdom
, and to return.
The "certain nobleman" represents Jesus, the "far country" represents heaven. Notice that it indicates that He went to a far country/heaven to receive a kingdom. It was in heaven that He received the kingdom because when He ascended to heaven He was exalted to the right hand of the Father and was then given authority "Far above all principality, and power, and might, and dominion, and every name that is named" (Eph 1:21).
In a spiritual sense I do have authority over the nations now. I even have authority over "all the power of the enemy". But if those are speaking of a future time that isn't a problem for my doctrine because they don't say anything about ruling over mortal unbelievers on the earth.