Your Advert here
cure-real
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Revelations interpreted?

  1. #1

    Revelations interpreted?

    I am a Catholic, and I would like to get your perspective on this interpretation of Revelations.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTefB...wvPAXMEfmQdJQU

    It is rather in the middle of the discussion, but this I think is better. This way if you don't find it biblical you can just move on, and if you do find it atleast interesting you can start from 1.

    I think that it is a very accurate interpretation, especially the parts about the old Roman Enpire, and the new. Obviously, I think that there are a few parts to it that the Brothers got a little too over confident on, and were wrong about.


    If the link doesn't work just search: is the world about to end? mhfm1

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    955

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    I think it is totally inaccurate.

    The mark of the beast is a mark placed on/in the right hand or the forehead. He is talking about the Euro currency that is external to ones body.


    All Praise The Ancient Of Days

  3. #3

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Adstars View Post
    I think it is totally inaccurate.

    The mark of the beast is a mark placed on/in the right hand or the forehead. He is talking about the Euro currency that is external to ones body.


    All Praise The Ancient Of Days
    The pope is not the seventh king. He is not the beast. He is the False Prophet and the leader of the ten kings (nations?) is the Beast. The Beast is the political/military leader and the False Prophet is the religious leader.

  4. #4

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by 400constantine View Post
    I am a Catholic, and I would like to get your perspective on this interpretation of Revelations.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTefB...wvPAXMEfmQdJQU

    It is rather in the middle of the discussion, but this I think is better. This way if you don't find it biblical you can just move on, and if you do find it atleast interesting you can start from 1.

    I think that it is a very accurate interpretation, especially the parts about the old Roman Enpire, and the new. Obviously, I think that there are a few parts to it that the Brothers got a little too over confident on, and were wrong about.


    If the link doesn't work just search: is the world about to end? mhfm1
    This was very interesting. Thank you for sharing.

  5. #5

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Adstars View Post
    I think it is totally inaccurate.

    The mark of the beast is a mark placed on/in the right hand or the forehead. He is talking about the Euro currency that is external to ones body.


    All Praise The Ancient Of Days
    So much od Revelation is figurative speech, how can we be sure the mark is physical?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    london
    Posts
    597

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by 400constantine View Post
    I am a Catholic, and I would like to get your perspective on this interpretation of Revelations.
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BTefB...wvPAXMEfmQdJQU

    It is rather in the middle of the discussion, but this I think is better. This way if you don't find it biblical you can just move on, and if you do find it atleast interesting you can start from 1.

    I think that it is a very accurate interpretation, especially the parts about the old Roman Enpire, and the new. Obviously, I think that there are a few parts to it that the Brothers got a little too over confident on, and were wrong about.


    If the link doesn't work just search: is the world about to end? mhfm1
    Sounds made up to me, I had to push myself to get past the 666 on the euro coin, I counted 12 stars and 12 straight lines=24 not 18. Like some above said the mark will be on our foreheads or hands. I think and it's only my opinion that we should look to the old bible lands for end time movement, especially Egypt.

  7. #7

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Adstars View Post
    I think it is totally inaccurate.

    The mark of the beast is a mark placed on/in the right hand or the forehead. He is talking about the Euro currency that is external to ones body.


    All Praise The Ancient Of Days
    The indication is that it will be how/what you think (forehead) and how/when you work (right hand). Think days here.

    Dan 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.

    Now how'd that get there?

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    955

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Odelia View Post
    So much od Revelation is figurative speech, how can we be sure the mark is physical?
    Because it has to do with a human interaction of buying and selling items. If you have the Mark you will be able to buy and sell but if you do not have the mark you will be unable.

    Using symbolic interpretations of the Mark of the beast is a mistake.


    All Praise The Ancient Of Days

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    63

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Being as there is so much symbolism in this book it is difficult for myself to think this is literal.

    Here is a way to look at it from the symbolic perspective...

    The mark on the forhead. Well the head is where our brain is, right? Head meaning knowledge?
    The mark on the hand? Could this mean extending fellowship to the beast?

    To me the "mark" is a mindset. Not an actual symbol. Not a tattoo, a coin, microchip and so on. If someone cears the mark their mind is set on the beast, and so are their actions...

    Does this make sense to anyone?

  10. #10
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    63

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by Adstars View Post
    Because it has to do with a human interaction of buying and selling items. If you have the Mark you will be able to buy and sell but if you do not have the mark you will be unable.

    Using symbolic interpretations of the Mark of the beast is a mistake.


    All Praise The Ancient Of Days
    Daniel was thrown in to the lion's den because he would not relinquish his religon. He had no mark. It was his heart and mind that caused him to be punished.

    Also, since God does not judge someone according to their appearance, I find it hard to believe that something PHYSICAL will determine someone's fate. God judges the soul. The heart of man. Things not seem be man.

  11. #11

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by MyCoolUsername View Post
    Being as there is so much symbolism in this book it is difficult for myself to think this is literal.

    Here is a way to look at it from the symbolic perspective...

    The mark on the forhead. Well the head is where our brain is, right? Head meaning knowledge?
    The mark on the hand? Could this mean extending fellowship to the beast?

    To me the "mark" is a mindset. Not an actual symbol. Not a tattoo, a coin, microchip and so on. If someone cears the mark their mind is set on the beast, and so are their actions...

    Does this make sense to anyone?
    Read post #7 above

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    63

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by John 8:32 View Post
    Read post #7 above
    hahahaha! Can I say that I am half awake right now and did NOT see that post?

    Sorry!

  13. #13

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by MyCoolUsername View Post
    hahahaha! Can I say that I am half awake right now and did NOT see that post?

    Sorry!
    Not a problem, just wanted you to know that you are not alone in this thinking.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    63

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by John 8:32 View Post
    Not a problem, just wanted you to know that you are not alone in this thinking.
    I am glad to see someone like you on here! Seems like you put humor in your statements too, as well as I.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    5,301
    Blog Entries
    1

    Re: Revelations interpreted?

    Quote Originally Posted by MyCoolUsername View Post
    Daniel was thrown in to the lion's den because he would not relinquish his religon. He had no mark. It was his heart and mind that caused him to be punished.

    Also, since God does not judge someone according to their appearance, I find it hard to believe that something PHYSICAL will determine someone's fate. God judges the soul. The heart of man. Things not seem be man.
    It is the mark, showing the allegiance and worship of the Beast, thus the heart. It is not getting a physical mark that is the problem, it is the reason coming from the heart that is that results in getting the mark that is the problem.




Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. How Strictly Should This Passage Be Interpreted?
    By VerticalReality in forum Bible Chat
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: Dec 18th 2011, 08:41 PM
  2. Replies: 37
    Last Post: Apr 22nd 2010, 01:05 PM
  3. A ? about Revelations
    By JesusReignsForever in forum Bible Chat
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: Dec 10th 2009, 06:02 AM
  4. What does Revelations 3:11
    By denise austin in forum End Times Chat
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Feb 26th 2009, 12:36 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •