Your Advert here
cure-real
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 44

Thread: Romans 7

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta Area (soutside)
    Posts
    11,341
    Blog Entries
    5

    Romans 7

    This passage comes up OFTEN in various conversations around here. I have posted on this many times but because of typing as opposed to speaking... I can really only say so much via this medium. However, a friend of mine has a very good teaching on this via MP3. It can be downloaded here. Right click and save to your computer if you want to listen to it later... worth the save and listening to a couple of times. Here is a link to his site and he has a lot of interesting stuff on there... for doctrine issues and those that enjoy simple End Times stuff.

    I want to discuss this after you read and here is what I have said on this matter.

    Romans 7:1 Since I am speaking to those who understand law, brothers, are you unaware that the law has authority over someone as long as he lives?

    Paul makes it clear here who his audience is... those who understand the law. You will see the words law/commandment/ principle/commands used throughout this passage in great number. I often times color code those words just to make it stand out... maybe I will do that in a seperate post. But Paul is speaking throughout this passage about the law and when he was under the law. We know this because the law no longer has authority over him as he describes in this first verse.

    2For example, a married woman is legally bound to her husband while he lives. But if her husband dies, she is released from the law regarding the husband.
    3So then, if she gives herself to another man while her husband is living, she will be called an adulteress. But if her husband dies, she is free from that law. Then, if she gives herself to another man, she is not an adulteress.
    4 Therefore, my brothers, you also were put to death in relation to the law through the [crucified]body of the Messiah, so that you may belong to another—to Him who was raised from the dead—that we may bear fruit for God.
    5 For when we were in the flesh, the sinful passions operated through the law in every part of us and bore fruit for death.
    6 But now we have been released from the law, since we have died to what held us, so that we may serve in the new way of the Spirit and not in the old letter of the law.

    Paul uses marriage as an example. When he was married to the law then he couldn't deviate from that. But through the crucified body of Jesus Christ we are now legally unattached to the law. You now no longer belong to this law but you belong to Christ. When you were in the flesh (not born again with the Spirit of God indwelling you) sin operated in you and sin taking advantage of the law (he gets into that next) you did nothing but bear fruit that was leading to death. The old way of the law died when we died to the law and were resurrected in the newness of the Spirit... in other words we are born again.

    7 What should we say then? Is the law sin? Absolutely not! On the contrary, I would not have known sin if it were not for the law. For example, I would not have known what it is to covet if the law had not said, Do not covet.

    Paul now starts going into the first person in this portion of Scripture. This is why many say that Paul is talking about his life "now" as opposed to back when he was under the law because they say he is talking in the first person here therefore.... but not at all. Paul is merely using his past self as the example.

    8 And sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, produced in me coveting of every kind. For apart from the law sin is dead.
    9 Once I was alive apart from the law, but when the commandment came, sin sprang to life
    10 and I died. The commandment that was meant for life resulted in death for me.
    11 For sin, seizing an opportunity through the commandment, deceived me, and through it killed me.
    12 So then, the law is holy, and the commandment is holy and just and good.
    Paul simply continues explaining the point of how it was that this holy law and the holy, just and good commandment was the very thing that he was dead from because it more or less simply produced death because of the sin that is in us. He continues with this very theme... still in the first person and still speaking of the time when he was under the law which kills him. This is not speaking of a man born again.

    13 Therefore, did what is good cause my death? Absolutely not! On the contrary, sin, in order to be recognized as sin, was producing death in me through what is good, so that through the commandment sin might become sinful beyond measure.
    14 For we know that the law is spiritual; but I am made out of flesh, sold into sin’s power.

    Again... read closely that 14th verse. This is not describing a born again man. This is speaking of a man sold into sins power... yet when Paul is born again he was purchased with a price and he was no long a slave to sin.

    15 For I do not understand what I am doing, because I do not practice what I want to do, but I do what I hate.
    16 And if I do what I do not want to do, I agree with the law that it is good.
    17 So now I am no longer the one doing it, but it is sin living in me.
    18 For I know that nothing good lives in me, that is, in my flesh. For the desire to do what is good is with me, but there is no ability to do it.
    19 For I do not do the good that I want to do, but I practice the evil that I do not want to do.
    20 Now if I do what I do not want, I am no longer the one doing it, but it is the sin that lives in me.

    That 18th verse tells us much as well. Paul now knows that there is ability within him to do it. He gets into that in the 8th chapter... The Spirit of God which brings him life is the same Spirit of God that gives him the ability to walk in the Spirit and no longer in the flesh.

    21 So I discover this principle: when I want to do good, evil is with me.
    22 For in my inner self I joyfully agree with God’s law.
    23 But I see a different law in the parts of my body, waging war against the law of my mind and taking me prisoner to the law of sin in the parts of my body.

    Here again Paul speaks of being taken prisoner to the law of sin... yet Paul let's us know that when we are walking in the Spirit then we are free from this law of sin and death. Paul is speaking of the time (still using himself as the example of when he learned of sin through the law and how he understands the struggle of those who know the law) when he was in fact a slave/prisoner to sin.

    24 What a wretched man I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death? 25 I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord! So then, with my mind I myself am a slave to the law of God, but with my flesh, to the law of sin.

    Under this system of law he was a wretched man in need of rescue. Who will do this? Jesus Christ our Lord. Look at this last verse... slave to the law of God in his mind but in the flesh a slave to the law of sin. Again this is not even close to any description that Paul ever gives of a born again person who has been set free from these very things.


    Visit our new website
    ! The Blog might interest some.. and Lord help me!!!... for those that twitter... there as well.

    A.W. Tozer said,
    "To escape the error of salvation by works we have fallen into the opposite error of salvation without obedience.”

    GO.... SERVE YOUR KING!


  2. #2
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,093
    Hi PP,

    I agree for the most part that Paul is describing his past self. I did have some points I got thinking after reading through.

    When a born again person sins whose slave are they in that moment?

    Either they cannot sin (never sin again context), in that moment they are a slave to sin, or they remain sons even though they sin. Right? Is there another option I am missing?

    Jesus replied, "I tell you the truth, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. Now a slave has no permanent place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. (Joh 8:34-36 NIV)

    So does Paul’s description of his past self paint a good picture of what happens when a born again sins or is there a different context again to their sinful acts?

    If so how would you describe it?

    Grace and peace,

    Joe
    Last edited by Walstib; Aug 22nd 2007 at 10:14 PM. Reason: Punctuation

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta Area (soutside)
    Posts
    11,341
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Walstib View Post
    Hi PP,

    I agree for the most part that Paul is describing his past self. I did have some points I got thinking after reading through.

    When a born again person sins whose slave are they in that moment?

    Either they cannot sin (never sin again context), in that moment they are a slave to sin, or they remain sons even though they sin. Right? Is there another option I am missing?

    Jesus replied, "I tell you the truth, everyone who sins is a slave to sin. Now a slave has no permanent place in the family, but a son belongs to it forever. So if the Son sets you free, you will be free indeed. (Joh 8:34-36 NIV)

    So does Paul’s description of his past self paint a good picture of what happens when a born again sins or is there a different context again to their sinful acts?

    If so how would you describe it?

    Grace and peace,

    Joe
    Quick question to ponder... not avoiding you but would like to wait a bit for others to maybe get involved and hopefully a few will actually listen to that link to the teaching by Steve. But do you think Paul is speaking as if someone that is going along righteously and then does a bonehead act of sin... or is Paul speaking here of someone practicing sin?

    As to the passage in John... the same John penned this to further the point.

    1 John 3:4 Everyone who practices sin also practices lawlessness; and sin is lawlessness.
    5 And you know that He appeared in order to take away sins; and in Him there is no sin.
    6 No one who abides in Him sins; no one who sins has seen Him or knows Him.
    7 Little children, let no one deceive you; the one who practices righteousness is righteous, just as He is righteous;
    8 the one who practices sin is of the devil; for the devil has sinned from the beginning. The Son of God appeared for this purpose, that He might destroy the works of the devil.
    9 No one who is born of God practices sin, because His seed abides in him; and he cannot sin, because he is born of God.
    10 By this the children of God and the children of the devil are obvious: anyone who does not practice righteousness is not of God, nor the one who does not love his brother.
    11 For this is the message which you have heard from the beginning, that we should love one another;

    And before that he says this.

    1 John 2:1 My little children, I am writing these things to you that you may not sin. And if anyone sins, we have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ the righteous;


    Paul isn't speaking of someone in Romans 7 that can say that sin isn't the norm. Sin is common... he is imprisoned by it.. a slave to it... etc.


    Visit our new website
    ! The Blog might interest some.. and Lord help me!!!... for those that twitter... there as well.

    A.W. Tozer said,
    "To escape the error of salvation by works we have fallen into the opposite error of salvation without obedience.”

    GO.... SERVE YOUR KING!


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,093
    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectPeter View Post
    Quick question to ponder... not avoiding you but would like to wait a bit for others to maybe get involved and hopefully a few will actually listen to that link to the teaching by Steve. But do you think Paul is speaking as if someone that is going along righteously and then does a bonehead act of sin... or is Paul speaking here of someone practicing sin?
    No worries. I would say he is speaking about someone who wants to do right in their mind but cannot find the strength on their own to carry it out all the time. Someone who does not have the victory of the cross alive in their life. Thanks be to God…! I don’t know I would say this person is practicing lawlessness as they want to do good. They want to please God. No? This would not be true of all the unregenerate as I see things.

    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectPeter View Post
    As to the passage in John... the same John penned this to further the point. **1 John 3:4-11 posted**
    The context of verse 6 and 9 was in mind with my previous questions. Well the context I myself understand now anyway. Harmonizing both passages you posted along with those from Romans… etc… I'll wait for your answer.

    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectPeter View Post
    And before that he says this **1 John 2:1 posted
    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectPeter View Post
    Paul isn't speaking of someone in Romans 7 that can say that sin isn't the norm. Sin is common... he is imprisoned by it.. a slave to it... etc.
    I hear you. I am always full of questions… How do you describe the difference between practicing and being enslaved? Looking at all John’s verses here.

    When you are ready,

    Joe

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Minnesota
    Posts
    2,810
    Blog Entries
    12
    One thought as I listen: Sin is expotential seperation from God.
    Seek ye FIRST the kingdom.
    Not second or third, but first.
    Only when all else pales to God, when He receives all glory,
    when He is the source of all hope,
    when His love is received and freely given,
    holding not to the world but to the promise to come,
    will all other things be added unto to you.


  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by Walstib View Post
    No worries. I would say he is speaking about someone who wants to do right in their mind but cannot find the strength on their own to carry it out all the time. Someone who does not have the victory of the cross alive in their life. Thanks be to God…! I don’t know I would say this person is practicing lawlessness as they want to do good. They want to please God. No? This would not be true of all the unregenerate as I see things.

    The context of verse 6 and 9 was in mind with my previous questions. Well the context I myself understand now anyway. Harmonizing both passages you posted along with those from Romans… etc… I'll wait for your answer.

    I hear you. I am always full of questions… How do you describe the difference between practicing and being enslaved? Looking at all John’s verses here.

    When you are ready,

    Joe
    Hi, Well as I see it Paul is describing himself as he is. 'I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord, so then I as I am in myself with the mind serve the law of God and with the flesh the law of sin.

    If Paul ever lets his flesh take over, down he goes into sin (I AM the chief of sinners; compare I AM carnal, sold under sin - Romans 7.14)). When he lets Christ strengthen his mind he serves the law of God. It is the principle of the Spirit of life in Christ Jesus which has made him free from the law of sin and death (Romans 8.2). And it is by walking after the Spirit that he maintains the mind of the Spirit (Romans 8.5). But let him once let the flesh take over (which he no doubt learned mainly not to do) and down he goes again. What a good job he serves the Good Shepherd Who then stoops to raise him again and set him back on the way of the Spirit. And so say all of us.

    In Him

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta Area (soutside)
    Posts
    11,341
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by Walstib View Post
    No worries. I would say he is speaking about someone who wants to do right in their mind but cannot find the strength on their own to carry it out all the time. Someone who does not have the victory of the cross alive in their life. Thanks be to God…! I don’t know I would say this person is practicing lawlessness as they want to do good. They want to please God. No? This would not be true of all the unregenerate as I see things.

    The context of verse 6 and 9 was in mind with my previous questions. Well the context I myself understand now anyway. Harmonizing both passages you posted along with those from Romans… etc… I'll wait for your answer.

    I hear you. I am always full of questions… How do you describe the difference between practicing and being enslaved? Looking at all John’s verses here.

    When you are ready,

    Joe
    Yeah... as it progresses then we move into chapter 8... and I think that seperates the two. Beauty of the boards though... we don't have to be in a hurry so I can go slow!


    Visit our new website
    ! The Blog might interest some.. and Lord help me!!!... for those that twitter... there as well.

    A.W. Tozer said,
    "To escape the error of salvation by works we have fallen into the opposite error of salvation without obedience.”

    GO.... SERVE YOUR KING!


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    638
    Blog Entries
    3
    Hi Project Peter

    I might be splitting hairs somewhat, nevertheless here goes.
    You said: Paul simply continues explaining the point of how it was that this holy law and the holy, just and good commandment was the very thing that he was dead from because it more or less simply produced death because of the sin that is in us. He continues with this very theme... still in the first person and still speaking of the time when he was under the law which kills him. This is not speaking of a man born again.
    Paul tells us elsewhere that the wages of sin is death. He is very clear that it is sin that produces death. I think it important that we realize that it is not the law as such that brings death,
    Ro 7:13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

    but rather it is the law that warns us that that sin is present in us and the fruit of that sin is death. The purpose of the law is then to point us to Christ that we may die in Him and so we are then released from the condemnation of the law.

    Ro 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.


    God Bless
    Jeremiah 15:16 Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and
    rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.


    For an unapologetic apologetic for topics ranging from the identity of antichrist to devotionals to end-time prophetic understanding and all sorts of stuff in between from an unashamedly Seventh Day Adventist perspective, please visit
    www.brakelite.wordpress.com

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta Area (soutside)
    Posts
    11,341
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by brakelite View Post
    Hi Project Peter

    I might be splitting hairs somewhat, nevertheless here goes.
    You said: Paul simply continues explaining the point of how it was that this holy law and the holy, just and good commandment was the very thing that he was dead from because it more or less simply produced death because of the sin that is in us. He continues with this very theme... still in the first person and still speaking of the time when he was under the law which kills him. This is not speaking of a man born again.
    Paul tells us elsewhere that the wages of sin is death. He is very clear that it is sin that produces death. I think it important that we realize that it is not the law as such that brings death,
    Ro 7:13 Was then that which is good made death unto me? God forbid. But sin, that it might appear sin, working death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.

    but rather it is the law that warns us that that sin is present in us and the fruit of that sin is death. The purpose of the law is then to point us to Christ that we may die in Him and so we are then released from the condemnation of the law.

    Ro 8:1 There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit.


    God Bless
    Earlier in Romans... Paul penned this.

    Romans 5:12 ¶Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned --
    13 for until the Law sin was in the world; but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
    14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.


    How do you read this? Keep in mind too that I agree with you and I wasn't intending to imply that the Law itself was the cause of death. But even still I think this point is worth bringing out.


    Visit our new website
    ! The Blog might interest some.. and Lord help me!!!... for those that twitter... there as well.

    A.W. Tozer said,
    "To escape the error of salvation by works we have fallen into the opposite error of salvation without obedience.”

    GO.... SERVE YOUR KING!


  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectPeter View Post
    Earlier in Romans... Paul penned this.

    Romans 5:12 ¶Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned --
    13 for until the Law sin was in the world; but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
    14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.


    How do you read this? Keep in mind too that I agree with you and I wasn't intending to imply that the Law itself was the cause of death. But even still I think this point is worth bringing out.
    Sometimes in Romans Paul brings up statements that others make in order to answer them (e.g. 3.1-8)

    It seems to me that this is what he is doing here.

    Paul says 'until the law sin was in the world'.

    his opponent says 'But sin is not imputed where there is no law.'

    Paul says 'nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of Adam'.

    For if death reigned sin was applied even if it was not imputed. And that must surely indicate that it was imputed. It was only that it was not 'legal sin'.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta Area (soutside)
    Posts
    11,341
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by petepet View Post
    Sometimes in Romans Paul brings up statements that others make in order to answer them (e.g. 3.1-8)

    It seems to me that this is what he is doing here.

    Paul says 'until the law sin was in the world'.

    his opponent says 'But sin is not imputed where there is no law.'

    Paul says 'nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of Adam'.

    For if death reigned sin was applied even if it was not imputed. And that must surely indicate that it was imputed. It was only that it was not 'legal sin'.
    But that's exactly it and that is exactly what Paul speaks of. Let's go back as early as the Garden. What was the Law... there was only 1?


    Visit our new website
    ! The Blog might interest some.. and Lord help me!!!... for those that twitter... there as well.

    A.W. Tozer said,
    "To escape the error of salvation by works we have fallen into the opposite error of salvation without obedience.”

    GO.... SERVE YOUR KING!


  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    638
    Blog Entries
    3
    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectPeter View Post
    But that's exactly it and that is exactly what Paul speaks of. Let's go back as early as the Garden. What was the Law... there was only 1?
    Hi.
    Whether there was 1 or 21 they can all come under one requirement: obedience. We are not informed through the word when murder was stipulated as a sin but we must conclude that Cain was guilty of it. Are we to suppose that Cain perhaps didn't know that killing his brother was wrong?
    Are we to conclude that not until Sinai was there a knowledge of sin? I do not think so. I believe the law was very much known right from the beginning.

    Ge 18:19 For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the LORD, to do justice and judgment; that the LORD may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him.

    Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.


    The law may not have been written until Sinai but it was surely known before then else how could God judge justly and righteously if His law was not known? For God does not impute sin except there be a law.(Rom 5:13)
    I am thinking particularly of the flood and the cities of the plain.

    I would suggest that His laws were commited to the subsequent generations of Adam orally. (Including the Sabbath)

    God Bless
    Jeremiah 15:16 Thy words were found, and I did eat them; and thy word was unto me the joy and
    rejoicing of mine heart: for I am called by thy name, O LORD God of hosts.


    For an unapologetic apologetic for topics ranging from the identity of antichrist to devotionals to end-time prophetic understanding and all sorts of stuff in between from an unashamedly Seventh Day Adventist perspective, please visit
    www.brakelite.wordpress.com

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Lebanon, Pennsylvania
    Posts
    843
    Quote Originally Posted by ProjectPeter View Post
    Earlier in Romans... Paul penned this.

    Romans 5:12 ¶Therefore, just as through one man sin entered into the world, and death through sin, and so death spread to all men, because all sinned --
    13 for until the Law sin was in the world; but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
    14 Nevertheless death reigned from Adam until Moses, even over those who had not sinned in the likeness of the offense of Adam, who is a type of Him who was to come.


    How do you read this? Keep in mind too that I agree with you and I wasn't intending to imply that the Law itself was the cause of death. But even still I think this point is worth bringing out.
    Sorry to interrupt

    But I read this as saying, that the sin from Adam was a separation from God, which would have been a Spiritual death not a physical death. And because of that sin from Adam the Spiritual death spread to all man kind , because all did the same as Adam did. They disobeyed God. Now because of this disobedience by Adam this separation from God or Spiritual Death continued from Adam through Moses, even to those who had not caused this in this first place, because they were all born under this sin from Adam because they were all born in a fleshly body. Except for the one who is to come who is to be born in the type of Adam.

    That's why I believe that Paul writes in Romans 8:1 " There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." It seems to me that the law could and would and does condemn the flesh and the Spirit of man, but Jesus came and did not do away with the law but fulfilled it, and gave us two new Commandments to do instead which was to Love the Lord thy God with all of our Hearts, Soul and Might, and Love thy neighbor as thyself. He said that on these two Commandments hang all the law. It would seem to me that if we did those two Commandments we could not condemn the Spirit of man, and therefore live our life for Christ by not living after the flesh but by living after the Spirit.

    Just my thoughts though.
    In Christ Love

    BCF

    2 Peter 1:20-21:

    "Knowing this first, that no prophecy of Scripture is of any private interpretation. For prophecy never came by the will of man, but holy men of God spoke as they were moved by the Holy Spirit."

    Search and believe the Scripture, before you believe anything man tells you.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta Area (soutside)
    Posts
    11,341
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by brakelite View Post
    Hi.
    Whether there was 1 or 21 they can all come under one requirement: obedience. We are not informed through the word when murder was stipulated as a sin but we must conclude that Cain was guilty of it. Are we to suppose that Cain perhaps didn't know that killing his brother was wrong?
    Are we to conclude that not until Sinai was there a knowledge of sin? I do not think so. I believe the law was very much known right from the beginning.

    Ge 18:19 For I know him, that he will command his children and his household after him, and they shall keep the way of the LORD, to do justice and judgment; that the LORD may bring upon Abraham that which he hath spoken of him.

    Gen 26:5 Because that Abraham obeyed my voice, and kept my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.


    The law may not have been written until Sinai but it was surely known before then else how could God judge justly and righteously if His law was not known? For God does not impute sin except there be a law.(Rom 5:13)
    I am thinking particularly of the flood and the cities of the plain.

    I would suggest that His laws were commited to the subsequent generations of Adam orally. (Including the Sabbath)

    God Bless
    But you aren't answering the question and thus not allowing the point to be made! Nevertheless the answer is 1... agree?


    Visit our new website
    ! The Blog might interest some.. and Lord help me!!!... for those that twitter... there as well.

    A.W. Tozer said,
    "To escape the error of salvation by works we have fallen into the opposite error of salvation without obedience.”

    GO.... SERVE YOUR KING!


  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Atlanta Area (soutside)
    Posts
    11,341
    Blog Entries
    5
    Quote Originally Posted by BCF View Post
    Sorry to interrupt

    But I read this as saying, that the sin from Adam was a separation from God, which would have been a Spiritual death not a physical death. And because of that sin from Adam the Spiritual death spread to all man kind , because all did the same as Adam did. They disobeyed God. Now because of this disobedience by Adam this separation from God or Spiritual Death continued from Adam through Moses, even to those who had not caused this in this first place, because they were all born under this sin from Adam because they were all born in a fleshly body. Except for the one who is to come who is to be born in the type of Adam.
    Very good!

    That's why I believe that Paul writes in Romans 8:1 " There is therefore now no condemnation to them which are in Christ Jesus, who walk not after the flesh, but after the Spirit." It seems to me that the law could and would and does condemn the flesh and the Spirit of man, but Jesus came and did not do away with the law but fulfilled it, and gave us two new Commandments to do instead which was to Love the Lord thy God with all of our Hearts, Soul and Might, and Love thy neighbor as thyself. He said that on these two Commandments hang all the law. It would seem to me that if we did those two Commandments we could not condemn the Spirit of man, and therefore live our life for Christ by not living after the flesh but by living after the Spirit.

    Just my thoughts though.
    Good thoughts but I shall try hard to refrain yet from getting into chapter 8!!! Mind you... I know it is difficult!


    Visit our new website
    ! The Blog might interest some.. and Lord help me!!!... for those that twitter... there as well.

    A.W. Tozer said,
    "To escape the error of salvation by works we have fallen into the opposite error of salvation without obedience.”

    GO.... SERVE YOUR KING!


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •