So here are two statements I have heard:
Support these statements for me please. How is this so? Is it because there are so many copies of the Bible in the world? Somehow that just doesn't seem to be good proof, since these Bibles we have are often made 2000 years after his life. And that also strikes me as a bit of a technicality, a play on words and meaning. Not quite the "Let your 'yes' be yes and your 'no' be no" we're encouraged to have.
- "There's more proof that Jesus lived than there is that Abraham Lincoln lived."
- "There's more proof that Jesus lived than there is that Julius Caesar lived."
Support these statements for me please. How is this so? Is it because there are so many copies of the Bible in the world? Somehow that just doesn't seem to be good proof, since these Bibles we have are often made 2000 years after his life. And that also strikes me as a bit of a technicality, a play on words and meaning. Not quite the "Let your 'yes' be yes and your 'no' be no" we're encouraged to have.
Comment