Over-Allegorization or Over-Literalization of the 144,000
The historical premillennialists thought that Christ would rule on earth for a thousand years following the tribulation period. Perhaps they did not all think the thousand years was a literal period. But they did not hold to anything like a pre-millennial rapture. And they did not teach that physical Israel remains the chosen people. This was all before the time of Origen (184-253 A.D.). Before Origen, Ireneaus [140-203], Justin Martyr [100-165], and Papias [80-155], and others were historical premillennialists.
Origen made use of broad allegory in interpreting Scripture, and Augustine followed his lead, saying the thousand year reign of Christ in Rev 20: 1-8 is an allegory of all the "church" age. Catholics and traditional Calvinists do the same. Catholics and many Calvinists now say that the 144,000 of Revelation 7 and 14 are merely the saved people of the entire "church age.".
This Over-Allegorization by the Catholics and Calvinists of the 144,000 as a Remnant in the last days destroys their ministry - for the Catholics and Calvinists.
Daniel 11: 33 says "And they that understand among the people shall instruct many: yet they shall fall by the sword, and by flame, by captivity, and by spoil, many days."
The 144, 000, who follow Christ wherever he goes, and are not deceptive (Revelation 14: 5), are witnesses to Christ at a time near the last trumpet and before the end of the tribulation of Matthew 24: 29-30.
On the other hand, the Christian Zionists, or dispensationalists, Over-Literalize the 144,000.
The site http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/es...william-e-cox/
says "Dispensationalists boast of literal interpretation of
Scripture, and cast aspersions at those who "spiritualize" some
passages of the Bible. Charles C. Ryrie, President of The Philadelphia
College of the Bible, says: (Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 114, July, 1957,
p. 254), only dispensationalism provides the key to consistent
literalism."
Charles Ryrie says that "Dispensationalists claim that their principle of hermeneutics is that of literal interpretation. This means interpretation gives to every word the same meaning it would have in normal usage, whether employed in writing, speaking, or thinking. It is sometimes called the principle of since the meaning of each word is determined by grammatical and historical considerations. The principle might also be called normal interpretation since the literal meaning of words is the normal approach to their understanding in all languages. It might also be designated plain interpretation so that no one receives the mistaken notion that the literal principle rules out figures of speech. Symbols, figures of speech, and types are all interpreted plainly in this method, and they are in no way contrary to literal interpretation. After all, the very existence of any meaning for a figure of speech depends on the reality of the literal meaning of the terms involved. Figures often make the meaning plainer, but it is the literal, normal, or plain meaning that they convey to the reader." [Charles C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism, Revised and Expanded, (Chicago: Moody Press, 1995), 80-1]
Christian Zionists will usually interpret a text by use of their theology, and/or by their their literalist grammatical-historical interpretation system rather than by other scriptures as was more often done prior to the 19th and 20th century takeover of so many denominations by this theology.
Therefore since the Book of Revelation lists the 12 tribes of Israel in Revelation 7: 4-8, and Revelation 14: 4 says they are not defiled with women and are virgins, therefore, following their
"Hermeneutics," from the pagan god Hermes, the 144,000 cannot be any other group than male Jewish virgins.
For example, the Christian Zionists would never look at Revelation 17: 1-11 where the metaphor of the "great *****" and a "woman" are used in talking about false religion or apostasy of several religions. These verses, for Christian Zionists, cannot be relevant to Revelation 17: 1-11 because their theology demands an honoring of physical Israel and the use of the humanistic grammatical-historical or literal method of intrpretation.
John Darby, known as the father of dispensationalism said " "The Church has sought to settle itself here, but it has no place on the earth... [Though] making a most constructive parenthesis, it forms no part of the regular order of God's earthly plans, but is merely an interruption of them to give a fuller character and meaning to them..."
John. N. Darby, 'The Character of Office in The Present Dispensation' Collected Writings., Eccl. I, Vol. I, p. 94.
"Them" are physical Israel (I Corinthians 10: 18, Romans 9: 8). The church, for Darby, exists to "give fuller character and meaning to all physical Israel." Darby thought that the purpose of the Christian church, the ekklesia as a meeting, assembly or congregation of Israel reborn in Christ, the Israel of God, made into The Body of Christ like the Catholic capital C Church, was to honor all physical Israel. The dispensationalists say that God's people, the Jews, are earthy. They are involved in physical and literal things, like the blood sacrifice of animals, a literal bloodline from Abraham, circumcision, and a physical temple building.
So, the followers of John Darby must say the 144,000 are all male Jewish virgins in order to honor physical Israel. This does not mean that there cannot be some people who will belong to the 144,000, and may now be part of the remnant, that were formerly Jewish in the flesh and in their doctrines. Those in Messianic Judaism mix the two covenants and are not witnesses to Christ in full because of their doctrines.
It is not given to those who Over-Allegorize or Over-Literalize the 144,000 to understand the truth about them at this time. There are other prophecies for which an understanding has not been given to those in various man-made theologies, or even to the Remnant at this point in time. Revelation 11 on the Two Witnesses, with its several statements from Revelation 11: 1 to Revelation 11: 6, are verses difficult to understand - and as far as I know, no one has been given the full meaning of these verses for a metaphoric understanding of this chapter.
The historical premillennialists thought that Christ would rule on earth for a thousand years following the tribulation period. Perhaps they did not all think the thousand years was a literal period. But they did not hold to anything like a pre-millennial rapture. And they did not teach that physical Israel remains the chosen people. This was all before the time of Origen (184-253 A.D.). Before Origen, Ireneaus [140-203], Justin Martyr [100-165], and Papias [80-155], and others were historical premillennialists.
Origen made use of broad allegory in interpreting Scripture, and Augustine followed his lead, saying the thousand year reign of Christ in Rev 20: 1-8 is an allegory of all the "church" age. Catholics and traditional Calvinists do the same. Catholics and many Calvinists now say that the 144,000 of Revelation 7 and 14 are merely the saved people of the entire "church age.".
This Over-Allegorization by the Catholics and Calvinists of the 144,000 as a Remnant in the last days destroys their ministry - for the Catholics and Calvinists.
Daniel 11: 33 says "And they that understand among the people shall instruct many: yet they shall fall by the sword, and by flame, by captivity, and by spoil, many days."
The 144, 000, who follow Christ wherever he goes, and are not deceptive (Revelation 14: 5), are witnesses to Christ at a time near the last trumpet and before the end of the tribulation of Matthew 24: 29-30.
On the other hand, the Christian Zionists, or dispensationalists, Over-Literalize the 144,000.
The site http://www.graceonlinelibrary.org/es...william-e-cox/
says "Dispensationalists boast of literal interpretation of
Scripture, and cast aspersions at those who "spiritualize" some
passages of the Bible. Charles C. Ryrie, President of The Philadelphia
College of the Bible, says: (Bibliotheca Sacra, Vol. 114, July, 1957,
p. 254), only dispensationalism provides the key to consistent
literalism."
Charles Ryrie says that "Dispensationalists claim that their principle of hermeneutics is that of literal interpretation. This means interpretation gives to every word the same meaning it would have in normal usage, whether employed in writing, speaking, or thinking. It is sometimes called the principle of since the meaning of each word is determined by grammatical and historical considerations. The principle might also be called normal interpretation since the literal meaning of words is the normal approach to their understanding in all languages. It might also be designated plain interpretation so that no one receives the mistaken notion that the literal principle rules out figures of speech. Symbols, figures of speech, and types are all interpreted plainly in this method, and they are in no way contrary to literal interpretation. After all, the very existence of any meaning for a figure of speech depends on the reality of the literal meaning of the terms involved. Figures often make the meaning plainer, but it is the literal, normal, or plain meaning that they convey to the reader." [Charles C. Ryrie, Dispensationalism, Revised and Expanded, (Chicago: Moody Press, 1995), 80-1]
Christian Zionists will usually interpret a text by use of their theology, and/or by their their literalist grammatical-historical interpretation system rather than by other scriptures as was more often done prior to the 19th and 20th century takeover of so many denominations by this theology.
Therefore since the Book of Revelation lists the 12 tribes of Israel in Revelation 7: 4-8, and Revelation 14: 4 says they are not defiled with women and are virgins, therefore, following their
"Hermeneutics," from the pagan god Hermes, the 144,000 cannot be any other group than male Jewish virgins.
For example, the Christian Zionists would never look at Revelation 17: 1-11 where the metaphor of the "great *****" and a "woman" are used in talking about false religion or apostasy of several religions. These verses, for Christian Zionists, cannot be relevant to Revelation 17: 1-11 because their theology demands an honoring of physical Israel and the use of the humanistic grammatical-historical or literal method of intrpretation.
John Darby, known as the father of dispensationalism said " "The Church has sought to settle itself here, but it has no place on the earth... [Though] making a most constructive parenthesis, it forms no part of the regular order of God's earthly plans, but is merely an interruption of them to give a fuller character and meaning to them..."
John. N. Darby, 'The Character of Office in The Present Dispensation' Collected Writings., Eccl. I, Vol. I, p. 94.
"Them" are physical Israel (I Corinthians 10: 18, Romans 9: 8). The church, for Darby, exists to "give fuller character and meaning to all physical Israel." Darby thought that the purpose of the Christian church, the ekklesia as a meeting, assembly or congregation of Israel reborn in Christ, the Israel of God, made into The Body of Christ like the Catholic capital C Church, was to honor all physical Israel. The dispensationalists say that God's people, the Jews, are earthy. They are involved in physical and literal things, like the blood sacrifice of animals, a literal bloodline from Abraham, circumcision, and a physical temple building.
So, the followers of John Darby must say the 144,000 are all male Jewish virgins in order to honor physical Israel. This does not mean that there cannot be some people who will belong to the 144,000, and may now be part of the remnant, that were formerly Jewish in the flesh and in their doctrines. Those in Messianic Judaism mix the two covenants and are not witnesses to Christ in full because of their doctrines.
It is not given to those who Over-Allegorize or Over-Literalize the 144,000 to understand the truth about them at this time. There are other prophecies for which an understanding has not been given to those in various man-made theologies, or even to the Remnant at this point in time. Revelation 11 on the Two Witnesses, with its several statements from Revelation 11: 1 to Revelation 11: 6, are verses difficult to understand - and as far as I know, no one has been given the full meaning of these verses for a metaphoric understanding of this chapter.
Comment