Christian Doctor Fired For Believing That Gender Is Biologically Determined

[Jude]

Christian Doctor Fired For Believing That Gender Is Biologically Determined..

A British doctor has committed the unpardonable sin. He is guilty of medical heresy. He has transgressed the sacred lines of revisionist science. Surely a man like this must be punished. And punished he shall be.

What exactly was the crime of Dr. David Mackereth, who had worked for the National Health Services for 26 years? He dared to affirm that sex is biologically determined. Yes, that was his terrible transgression.

As the headline in the Daily Mail states, "Christian doctor is SACKED by the Government for refusing to identify patients by their preferred gender because he believes sex is established at birth."

http://www.prophecynewswatch.com/art...t_news_id=2391


Jude

[keck553]

Any sources other than the daily conspiracy Illuminati Elders of Zion digest?

[Jude]

Any sources other than the daily conspiracy Illuminati Elders of Zion digest?

Plenty.. just look them up..


Jude

[keck553]

Plenty.. just look them up..


Jude

I tired. All I get are conspiracy sites and sites that are usually debunked and dismissed.

[Jude]

I tired. All I get are conspiracy sites and sites that are usually debunked and dismissed.

Then just ask your Jesuit friends..


Jude

[Aviyah]

Any sources other than the daily conspiracy Illuminati Elders of Zion digest?

After digging through way too many tabloids, I found the original source at The Telegraph. The story reeks of incomplete information though, which is why the conspiracy nuts have jumped on it. However, there was a similar, less severe case last year which involved a teacher/student reported by BBC. The doctor being fired probably has elements of truth even though we aren't getting the full picture.

[BrianW]

I'm not saying that this actually happened because as others have stated there's is no evidence to be found at credible sites citing credible sources.

I will say though that I can easily believe it could happen. And actually, the Dr in this story wasn't actually fired he apparently was refused a contract to work for the DWP.
With 26 years experience as a Dr I doubt he would have trouble finding another employer or starting his own practice.

[Jude]

Is MSN fake news as well?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...nts/ar-AAzJSWr


Jude

[glfglf]

Is MSN fake news as well?

https://www.msn.com/en-gb/news/world...nts/ar-AAzJSWr


Jude

As long as news reporters are allowed to report their opinions, then we will continue being lied to!

[keck553]

For one thing, the good Dr wasn’t fired, he was going through an assessment to qualify to assess benefits and employment opportunities for clients and was not HIRED as a contractor.

During his assessment training, which was addressing bigotry towards LBGT people seeking employment and/or benefits, he displayed his intentions not to address them by their (or what he perceived to be) gender.

So he was regarded unfit for the position.

I don’t see a problem with this. It’s not like he was an established employee (as the thread title misleadingly alludes to). He knew what he was getting into.

The article goes on to say he has not been dismissed from any position nor stuck from any medical registers.

Jude, once again you cited a source that twisted this story so badly what you posted is;

FAKE NEWS

[Jude]

Is The Christian Post Illuminati Elders of Zion digest for running this article?

https://www.christianpost.com/voice/...ael-brown.html


Jude

[Sonajero]

Is The Christian Post Illuminati Elders of Zion digest for running this article?

https://www.christianpost.com/voice/...ael-brown.html


Jude

The article does seem to get lost somewhere between trying to present a Christian perspective and a scientific perspective. If someone is being sacked for refusing to follow protocol that's unremarkable, it would be akin to someone being fired for refusing to follow the corporate dress code, or who insisted on taking their lunch break at 3pm when their designated time for lunch was at 1pm. The scientific case that men are different to women in ways that could affect appropriate treatment is a different beast entirely. Honestly, that article looks like it muddies two different concepts to justify the point it wanted to make.

Yes, it's silly that we now live in a world where a man can decide he is a woman and suddenly impose requirements to be addressed as such. But let's look on the bright side - it's cheaper to get medical treatment at the veterinarian that at the hospital so from here on I think I'm going to identify as a cat and see how much money I can save.

[Fenris]

Christian doctor is SACKED by the Government

That says it all right there. Employers can sack you. That's how the world works. Even in the United States, which has Constitution right to freedom of speech (the UK really doesn't), government employees have far less leeway.

[FreedMan]

Not saying if the various reports are correct or not, and Brother Keck seems to be tracking something a little deeper than some internet blog post, but, even if it did happen, what does that mean either for that doctor in Britain or for us here in the United States.

This part is still true: "11 Blessed are ye, when men shall revile you, and persecute you, and shall say all manner of evil against you falsely, for my sake.

12 Rejoice, and be exceeding glad: for great is your reward in heaven: for so persecuted they the prophets which were before you."

I don't see how this is a problem for the believer, if it actually happened.

Are Christians now supposed to be protected from persecution?

[keck553]

The article does seem to get lost somewhere between trying to present a Christian perspective and a scientific perspective. If someone is being sacked for refusing to follow protocol that's unremarkable, it would be akin to someone being fired for refusing to follow the corporate dress code, or who insisted on taking their lunch break at 3pm when their designated time for lunch was at 1pm. The scientific case that men are different to women in ways that could affect appropriate treatment is a different beast entirely. Honestly, that article looks like it muddies two different concepts to justify the point it wanted to make.

Yes, it's silly that we now live in a world where a man can decide he is a woman and suddenly impose requirements to be addressed as such. But let's look on the bright side - it's cheaper to get medical treatment at the veterinarian that at the hospital so from here on I think I'm going to identify as a cat and see how much money I can save.

Trust me on this, vet bills are way higher than Dr bills