Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

  1. #16
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Resting in Him
    Posts
    6,378

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    Quote Originally Posted by Pbminimum View Post
    It would be foolish to impeach a sitting President that the DOJ found no evidence to suggest doing so. There has been claims of collusion since day one, and it didn't pan out. They need to move on because its getting ridiculous. They need to find evidence of laws being broken and prosecute, or they need to stop.
    The report said there was substantial evidence of many laws broken ... and again ... a sitting President cannot be prosecuted ... he can only be impeached. And I don't get where you found there was "no evidence" ... there was even evidence of collusion but not sufficient evidence to indict ... and the report said there were lies and deleted messages (oh wow deleted messages) by some that hindered the ability to investigate the collusion ...
    ***
    Lead me in Your truth and teach me,
    For You are the God of my salvation;
    On You I wait all the day.

    Psalms 25:5
    ***

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    32,563
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    Quote Originally Posted by Christinme View Post
    The report said there was substantial evidence of many laws broken ... and again ... a sitting President cannot be prosecuted ... he can only be impeached. And I don't get where you found there was "no evidence" ... there was even evidence of collusion but not sufficient evidence to indict ... and the report said there were lies and deleted messages (oh wow deleted messages) by some that hindered the ability to investigate the collusion ...
    You're reaching. You can soak in conspiracy theories and waste your time or you can look at the REAL evidence that this administration is MUCH MORE hostile to Russia than the past one.
    Those who seek God with all their heart will find Him and be given sight. Those who seek their own agenda will remain blind.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Resting in Him
    Posts
    6,378

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    Quote Originally Posted by keck553 View Post
    You're reaching. You can soak in conspiracy theories and waste your time or you can look at the REAL evidence that this administration is MUCH MORE hostile to Russia than the past one.
    Neither Mueller or Barr said there was no evidence ... they said there wasn't enough evidence ...

    And I do not "soak in conspiracy theories" that is what Trump does ...

    And the administration continuing the hostility to Russia that previous administrations have had and building on it is correct, they have done this ... but that has mostly been done against Trump's wishes ... I could go on about this but don't feel it's necessary at this time ...
    ***
    Lead me in Your truth and teach me,
    For You are the God of my salvation;
    On You I wait all the day.

    Psalms 25:5
    ***

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    32,563
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    Quote Originally Posted by Christinme View Post
    Neither Mueller or Barr said there was no evidence ... they said there wasn't enough evidence ...

    And I do not "soak in conspiracy theories" that is what Trump does ...

    And the administration continuing the hostility to Russia that previous administrations have had and building on it is correct, they have done this ... but that has mostly been done against Trump's wishes ... I could go on about this but don't feel it's necessary at this time ...
    So if you were falsely accused of something and there was insufficient evidence to convict you, how would you feel when the mob denied you due process?
    Those who seek God with all their heart will find Him and be given sight. Those who seek their own agenda will remain blind.

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    Resting in Him
    Posts
    6,378

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    Quote Originally Posted by keck553 View Post
    So if you were falsely accused of something and there was insufficient evidence to convict you, how would you feel when the mob denied you due process?
    The conspiracy theories that Trump "soaks in" are not only concerning this ... he is a big fan of a number of the major conspiracy theory promoters.

    And what do you mean the mob denied him due process ... what would due process mean for a person that cannot be charged???

    Before it was put out that there was insufficient evidence to convict on the Russian part he did many things that suggested obstruction of Justice. Seriously the way he talked about how unfairly Manifort was treated who was a convicted criminal and how he talked about those who cooperated as "rats", I could go on ... and again the Mueller report concluded that gathering the evidence was hindered by deleted texts and lies ... that is why there is such a thing as obstruction of Justice and why even if you don't have sufficient evidence to convict on the main charge you can convict on an obstruction of Justice charge otherwise if one obstructs good enough to destroy evidence then a person goes scot free ... so if obstruction of Justice can be proven there is recourse ...

    And the way he spoke about Mueller even before the report was given ... what evidence did Trump have to back up his accusations against Mueller ... or is he not only exempt from indictment but also exempt from having to prove the accusations he makes. Trump as President is constantly making accusations against others of having committed crimes without "due process" ...
    ***
    Lead me in Your truth and teach me,
    For You are the God of my salvation;
    On You I wait all the day.

    Psalms 25:5
    ***

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    32,563
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    You and the left can waste all the time you want on this. The evidence is now clear that Comey targeted Trump with a fake conspiracy. The IG report will start the process to indict and send these coup conspirators to prison.

    In the meantime, the democrats have spent since 2018 all their collateral spinning tales, lying and over the top demagogy of racism and genocide of latino's instead of moving our country forward.

    I don't think Trump could have a better campaign ad than the hole the democrats have dug themselves in and entrapped themselves in their own snare.

    It's almost Biblical.

    You and the left can waste all the time you want on this. The evidence is now clear that Comey targeted Trump with a fake conspiracy. The IG report will start the process to indict and send these coup conspirators to prison.

    In the meantime, the democrats have spent since 2018 all their collateral spinning tales, lying and over the top demagogy of racism and genocide of latino's instead of moving our country forward.

    I don't think Trump could have a better campaign ad than the hole the democrats have dug themselves in and entrapped themselves in their own snare.

    It's almost Biblical.
    Those who seek God with all their heart will find Him and be given sight. Those who seek their own agenda will remain blind.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Pacific NW, USA
    Posts
    11,223

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    Quote Originally Posted by keck553 View Post
    You and the left can waste all the time you want on this. The evidence is now clear that Comey targeted Trump with a fake conspiracy. The IG report will start the process to indict and send these coup conspirators to prison.

    In the meantime, the democrats have spent since 2018 all their collateral spinning tales, lying and over the top demagogy of racism and genocide of latino's instead of moving our country forward.

    I don't think Trump could have a better campaign ad than the hole the democrats have dug themselves in and entrapped themselves in their own snare.

    It's almost Biblical.
    I couldn't agree more. The Political Left acts like Communist Radicals--the politics of power and manipulation. There is no morality involved--just an unapologetic lust for power and a willingness to do whatever is necessary to achieve that power. I fully understand that Trump used like immoral tactics in demonizing, unfairly, his opponents during the nomination process within his own party. I don't like how he called Ted Cruz "Lyin' Ted," etc.

    However, what I see now in the Democratic Party pales in comparison. They appear to have hired a research firm to get opposition research on Trump, and then slip it in through the back door into the DOJ and FBI, obtaining govt. means of sabotaging the Trump campaign and presidency. Now, after several years we've wasted normal govt. functions that serve the people, going after a presidency for purely political purposes, so that the Democrats can regain power and the presidency. The Congress wastes time going after Trump, instead of serving the people, assuming that "serving the people" means that they must reacquire power.

    The Mueller report was flawed. The basis for the Mueller appointment was flawed. Sessions should never have been pressured to recuse himself. And Clinton should never have even been allowed to run for President, once it became clear she had subpoenaed material destroyed. Brennan, Clapper, Ohr, Comey, Strzok, Page, and maybe even Clinton, Lynch, and Obama, should be dragged back into court to account for this apparent political conspiracy.

    Quite frankly, I think the conspiracy to go after Trump was designed so as to never expose the conspiracy against him, and to prevent any investigation into these corrupt political tactics by the Democrats. It's therefore no surprise that Congress is working so hard, ie Nadler and Schiff, to focus away from the origins of this conspiracy and continue to double down on a Trump investigation that has petered out.

    The panicked cry that "a president is immune from criminal prosecution" is muted by the very real threat of impeachment, once criminality has been established. However, it was established by a very large, neutral investigation that there was insufficient evidence, which would be necessary to prosecute a crime. Even more Mueller appears to have hired investigators who were biased *against* the President.

    It *should* be difficult to prosecute a President, since the opposing Party has an interest in mucking up problems for the President. The President was vetted and elected by the people to represent them against other political interests that could subvert this authority. Why such immunity would be decried is, I suspect, motivated by political interests.

    The worst thing of it all is that the Media largely supports, without embarrassment, the cause of the Democratic Party. Every claim, justified or unjustified, is backed up by media reporting. It is no surprise to me, therefore, that there is this popular clamor for impeachment, or so it seems. In the next election we may find, as we did with Clinton, that this was just a media invention. As was said, "There's a sucker born every minute."

  8. #23
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Posts
    32,563
    Blog Entries
    4

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    Yeah, it's pretty obvious the left is consumed with a hatred of free citizens and will do practically anything to transform American citizens into subject of the state. Then the real persecution can begin.
    Those who seek God with all their heart will find Him and be given sight. Those who seek their own agenda will remain blind.

  9. #24
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Northeast Alabama
    Posts
    5,023

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    Quote Originally Posted by keck553 View Post
    Yeah, it's pretty obvious the left is consumed with a hatred of free citizens and will do practically anything to transform American citizens into subject of the state. Then the real persecution can begin.
    This is happening as we speak. There are now so many people that are blind to the truth that when it happens they will be cheering instead of mourning.

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Pacific NW, USA
    Posts
    11,223

    Re: if there is not enough evidence to prove someone guilty,

    Read Mark Levin's book, "Unfreedom of the Press." We grow up in this country, and live here, believing in the *ideal* American Democracy, not realizing that *never* has there been true and fair Democracy! The Press has *always* been biased, and there has been scandal after scandal in presidential administrations that is never touched by the courts, the media, or the people. I suspect many simply don't even know they took place.

    Finding a few errors to prosecute Trump is a wasted effort, since somebody correctly said that "we are all guilty before God." The question is, how serious must crimes be to impeach a president? I dare say that most presidents were not impeached who committed blatant crimes. They simply were not prosecuted, or were dismissed or ignored.

    The current attack on Trump is pure politics at its worst. I voted for Trump, and I've hardly been afforded the benefit of my decision. This conspiracy to destroy both his campaign and his presidency has hamstrung him, and has caused me to have to focus on politics for the last several years, instead of encourage solutions in our country. Enough already!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. NOT GUILTY
    By Dravenhawk in forum Breaking News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Jul 14th 2013, 04:10 AM
  2. Should the wealthy feel guilty?
    By Warrior4God in forum Bible Chat
    Replies: 84
    Last Post: Dec 1st 2012, 07:24 PM
  3. Pope's butler guilty
    By Protective Angel in forum Breaking News
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: Oct 9th 2012, 03:49 AM
  4. SANDUSKY GUILTY VERDICT
    By HollyRock in forum Breaking News
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Jun 24th 2012, 02:41 AM
  5. I think I offended someone -- feel guilty
    By Equipped_4_Love in forum Growing in Christ
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Jun 28th 2010, 11:26 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •